![]() It can reverse and smoke out with ESS easily, it can't be 1-hit KO'd easily, and it can't be dunked on by helis easily.Ħ: The 2a4 is marginally a similar vehicle to the Abrams, though I'd consider it inferior simply because it doesn't have the insane survivability of the Abrams.ħ: T-80U, this is the first vehicle I'd even consider comparable to the Abrams (if inferior), it still doesn't have the survivability, it doesn't have the reverse speed or the getaway cards that the Abrams has. The Abrams armor is also very sufficient, and the tank in general has some of the best handling characteristics of all top tier vehicles (in terms of gun control systems and movement), put simply, the Abrams is just functionally a better tank. Teammates can notice and come to the rescue of the Abrams under fire, etc. If a T-80 manages to flank, he's RARELY going to kill an enemy Abrams with a single shot, which means his time to kill is far larger, meaning he'll have far less impact on a flank overall. Put it this way, if I have a team of 8 T-80's and a team of 8 Abrams, if only one of those Abrams manages to flank, he could easily kill half the enemy team and with single shots as well. Very rarely are you gonna delete one of these tanks in a single shot, which from a teamplay point of view, is a HUGE deal. Also the lack of stabiliser and the enormous silhoutte are drawbacks.ĥ: M1A1 (and all the Abrams for that matter) are still the best survivable tanks in the game, which is why I believe they're 100% better than the T-80U from a gameplay perspective. I put this 3rd place though due to the fact that you only have 8 of them, not really a big weakness tbh. Pro tip: Just get into a good spot and hammer away at everyone.Ĥ: ADATS for whatever reason never seems to hull break, and its missiles are unmistakebly monstrous. Its also very trolly with the ERA package vs helicopters, I've wasted several missiles in my Lynx not realising I was shooting at the new War package Ariete, which sucked. ![]() Very close second.ģ: The Ariete is a monster, rendering all armor except the Chally 2 cheeks and 2a5 turret obsolete. OTOMATIC (no joke, extremely competitive vehicle ironically)Ĭhallenger 2 + Type 90 joint bottom (Type 90 has its perks like Hydraulic suspension etc, but is a terrible MBT overall, little to no survivability)ġ: The Leopard 2a5 has the best all around package, from high-definition thermals and night vision, commander night vision (binos) which is a massive advantage, decent tier shell, impenetrable hull-down capability (even the chally 2 doesn't have this for whatever stupid reason), best general manueverability in all directions and even trolly side armor at times, a benefit that no other top tier tank has.Ģ: The Leclerc is like a baby 2a5, you get a better shell, more weakspots, a better reload rate and similar performance, but unlike the 2a5, its far from being impenetrable when hulldown, so you can't just delete a team without consequence when in a good spot. I feel like top tier goes like this, from best to worst: Comparing the 80U to the M1A1 is just unfair. I'd even go as far to say that meta wise, the T-80U is the first Russian counterpart to the M1 / IPM1 Abrams. Although idk how good it is now with the WAR package. *Ariete is only there because it can penetrate a T-80U frontally though the UFP, and is the best performing with pure penetration. I don’t know for sure, but the ‘average’ I hear is T-80U is better than the M1A1, except for close range (M1A1 has better turret traverse and the weakspots are bigger and easier to hit). M10,2a5,leclerc(spelling?),ariete,T-80U/M1A1(super close but t80 wins), Leclerc is right, Originally posted by FB||Edgrponce:Im gana do top 5 best top tiers cause alot of vehicles are 10.0
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |